MCQ
$0.1\, M$ formic acid solution is titrated against $0.1 \,M \,NaOH$ solution. What would be the difference in $pH$ between $1/5$ and $4/5$ stages of neutralization of acid ?
- A$2 \log \,3/4$
- B$2 \log\, 1/5$
- C$\log\, 1/3$
- ✓$2 \log \,4$
✓
Answer
Correct option: D.
$2 \log \,4$
d
When acetic acid is titrated with NaOH it will behaave as Buffer solution.
When acetic acid is titrated with NaOH it will behaave as Buffer solution.
We know in case of acidic buffer $\mathrm{pH}=\mathrm{pK}_{\mathrm{a}}+\log \frac{[\mathrm{Salt}]}{[\mathrm{Acid}]}$
$\mathrm{pK}_{\mathrm{a}}$ of acetic acid $=4.77$
In case of $\frac{1}{5}$ th Titration $-$
$[$ Salt $]=\frac{x}{5}$
[Acid $]=\frac{4 x}{5}$
$\mathrm{pH}_{1}=4.77+\log \frac{1}{4}$
In case of $\frac{4}{5}$ th Titration -
$\mathrm{pH}_{2}=4.77+\log \frac{4}{1}$
Difference in $\mathrm{pH}=2 \log 4$
Need a full question paper?
Generate a complete, print-ready paper with questions like this in minutes — across 16+ boards, with answer keys.
Explore more
Similar questions
$\underset{(A)}{\mathop{\begin{matrix}
\,\,\,\,\,Ph\,\,\,\,C{{H}_{3}} \\
|\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,|\,\, \\
Ph-C-C-C{{H}_{3}} \\
|\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,|\,\,\, \\
\,OH\,\,\,OH \\
\end{matrix}}}\,+\underset{(B)}{\mathop{\begin{matrix}
\,\,\,\,Ph\,\,\,Et \\
\,\,|\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,| \\
Ph-C-C-Et \\
\,\,|\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,| \\
\,\,\,\,\,OH\,\,OH \\
\end{matrix}}}\,\xrightarrow{{{H}_{2}}S{{O}_{4}}}$
→\,\,\,\,\,Ph\,\,\,\,C{{H}_{3}} \\
|\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,|\,\, \\
Ph-C-C-C{{H}_{3}} \\
|\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,|\,\,\, \\
\,OH\,\,\,OH \\
\end{matrix}}}\,+\underset{(B)}{\mathop{\begin{matrix}
\,\,\,\,Ph\,\,\,Et \\
\,\,|\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,| \\
Ph-C-C-Et \\
\,\,|\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,| \\
\,\,\,\,\,OH\,\,OH \\
\end{matrix}}}\,\xrightarrow{{{H}_{2}}S{{O}_{4}}}$
$(p)$ $\begin{matrix}
Ph\,\,\,\,\,O\, \\
|\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,||\,\, \\
Ph-C-C-C{{H}_{3}} \\
|\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \\
C{{H}_{3}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \\
\end{matrix}$ $(q)$ $\begin{matrix}
\,Ph\,\,\,\,\,O\, \\
\,\,|\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,|| \\
Ph-C-C-Et \\
|\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \\
Et\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \\
\end{matrix}$
$(r)$ $\begin{matrix}
\,Ph\,\,\,\,\,O\, \\
|\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,||\, \\
Ph-C-C-C{{H}_{3}} \\
|\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \\
Et\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \\
\end{matrix}$ $(s)$ $\begin{matrix}
\,\,\,Ph\,\,\,\,\,O\, \\
\,\,|\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,|| \\
Ph-C-C-Et \\
|\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \\
C{{H}_{3}}\,\,\,\, \\
\end{matrix}$
When $(A)$ and $(B)$ reacts with $H_2SO_4$ products obtained are
$P_4O_{10}$ reacts with $HNO_3$ to give
→If an orbital could contain $3e^-$, total groups in periodic table would have been
→Rutherford’s experiment on scattering of $\alpha -$ particles showed for the time that the atom has
→Trioxalato aluminate $(III)$ and tetrafluoro-borate $(III)$ ions are :
→Transition state $2$ is structurally most likely as
→In which of the following options the order of arrangement does not agree with the variation of property indicated against it ?
The coordination number of a metal in coordination compounds is
For the reaction ,${N_2} + {O_2} \rightleftharpoons 2NO$ equilibrium constant $K_c = 2.$ Degree of dissociation of $N_2$ and $O_2$ are (Both have same initial moles)
→For the reaction $2S{O_2} + {O_2} \to 2S{O_3}$,the rate of disappearance of $O_2$ is $2.0\times 10^{-4}\ mol\ L^{-1}s^{-1}$. The rate of appearance of $SO_3$ is
→