Download App

Matrices — MATHS STD 12 Science — Question

Rajasthan BoardEnglish MediumSTD 12 ScienceMATHSMatrices1 Mark
Question
Assertion (A) : If $\left[\begin{array}{cc}x y & 4 \\ z+5 & x+y\end{array}\right]=\left[\begin{array}{cc}4 & w \\ 0 & 4\end{array}\right]$, then $x=2, y=2, z=-5$ and $w=4$.
Reason (R) : Two matrices are equal, if their orders are same and their corresponding elements are equal.
✓

Answer

(a) : $\left[\begin{array}{cc}x y & 4 \\ z+5 & x+y\end{array}\right]=\left[\begin{array}{cc}4 & w \\ 0 & 4\end{array}\right]$
On equating the corresponding elements, we get
$
x y=4, w=4, z+5=0 \text { and } x+y=4
$
On solving these equations, we get $x=2, y=2, z=-5$ and $w=4$. Also, the two matrices are equal, if their orders are same and their corresponding elements are equal.

Need a full question paper?

Generate a complete, print-ready paper with questions like this in minutes — across 16+ boards, with answer keys.

Start Generating Free

Explore more

More "Assertion (A) & Reason (B) MCQ" from Matrices→Matrices — all question types→MATHS STD 12 Science question papers→Rajasthan Board STD 12 Science question papers→Rajasthan Board question paper generator→

Similar questions

Assertion $(A): \int_2^8 \frac{\sqrt{10-x}}{\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{10-x}} d x=3$
Reason $(R): \int_a^b f(x) d x=\int_a^b f(a+b-x) d x$
→
Assertion (A) : Number of roots of the equation $\cot ^{-1} x+\cos ^{-1} 2 x+\pi=0$ is zero.
Reason (R) : Range of $\cot ^{-1} x$ and $\cos ^{-1} x$ is $(0, \pi)$ and $[0, \pi]$, respectively.
→
Directions: In the following questions, the Assertions (A) and Reason(s) (R) have been put forward. Read both the statements carefully and choose the correct alternative from the following:
Assertion (A): $\text{f(x)}=\sin\text{x}$ is continuous for all $\text{x }\epsilon\text{ R}$
Reason (R): $\sin\text{x}$ and $\text{x}$ are continuous at on R.
  1. Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
  2. Both A and R are true but R is NOT the correct explanation of A
  3. A is true but R is false.
  4. A is false but R is true.
→
Assertion $(A):$ The lines $\vec{r}=\vec{a}_1+\lambda \vec{b}_1$ and $\vec{r}=\vec{a}_2+\mu \vec{b}_2$ are perpendicular, when $\vec{b}_1 \cdot \vec{b}_2=0$.
Reason $(R):$ The angle $\theta$ between the lines $\vec{r}=\vec{a}_1+\lambda \vec{b}_1$ and $\vec{r}=\vec{a}_2+\mu \vec{b}_2$ is given by $\cos \theta=\frac{\vec{b}_1 \cdot \vec{b}_2}{\left|\vec{b}_1\right|\left|\vec{b}_2\right|}$.
→
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of assertion (A) is followed by a statement of reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:
Assertion: For two matrices A and B of order 3, $\mid\text{A}\mid=2\mid\text{B}\mid=-3$ then if $\mid2\text{AB}\mid$ is -48.
Reason: For a square matrix A, $\text{A}(\text{adj}\ \text{A})=(\text{adj}\ \text{A})\text{A}=\mid\text{A}\mid.$
  1. Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.
  2. Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A.
  3. A is true but R is false.
  4. A is false but R is true.
  5. Both A and R are false.
→
Assertion (A): The modulus function $f : R \rightarrow R$ given by $f ( x )=| x |$ is neither one-one nor onto.
Reason (R): The signum function $f : R \rightarrow R$ given by $f ( x )=\left\{\begin{array}{cl}1, & x>0 \\ 0, & x=0 \\ -1, & x<0\end{array}\right.$ is bijective.
→
Assertion (A): A relation $R =\{( a , b )$ : $| a - b |<3\}$ defined on the set $A =\{1,2,3,4\}$ is reflexive.
Reason (R): A relation $R$ on the set $A$ is said to be reflexive if for $(a, b) \in R$ and $(b, c) \in R$, we have $(a, c) \in R$.
→
Assertion (A) : If the cartesian equation of a line is $\frac{x-5}{3}=\frac{y+4}{7}=\frac{z-6}{2}$, then its vector form is $\vec{r}=5 \hat{i}-4 \hat{j}+6 \hat{k}+\lambda(3 \hat{i}+7 \hat{j}+2 \hat{k})$.
Reason (R): The vector equation of line passing through the points $A(\vec{a})$ and parallel to vector $\vec{b}$ is $\vec{r}=\vec{a}-\lambda(\vec{a}-\vec{b})$, where $\lambda \in R$ is a parameter.
→
Assertion (A): Two coins are tossed simultaneously. The probability of getting two heads, if it is known that at least one head comes up, is $\frac{1}{3}$.
Reason $(R)$ : Let $E$ and $F$ be two events with a random experiment, then $P(F / E)=\frac{P(E \cap F)}{P(E)}$.
→
Let $H_1, H_2, \ldots, H_n$ be mutually exclusive and exhaustive events with $P\left(H_i\right) > 0, i=1,2, \ldots, n$. Let $E$ be any other event with $0$ Assertion $(A) : P\left(H_i \mid E\right) > P\left(E \mid H_i\right) P\left(H_i\right)$ for $i=1,2, \ldots, n$
$\text { Reason (R) : } \sum_{i=1}^n P\left(H_i\right)=1 \text {. }$
→