Question
Principles of Taylor and Fayol are mutually complementary. One believed that the management should share the gain with the workers while the other suggested that employees compensation should depend upon the earning capacity of the company and should give them a reasonable standard of living. Identify and explain the principles of management by Tayol and Fayol referred to in para?

Answer

Fayol-Remuneration, Taylor- Harmony not discord (mental revolution)

Need a full question paper?

Generate a complete, print-ready paper with questions like this in minutes — across 16+ boards, with answer keys.

Start Generating Free

Similar questions

Name the process of searching for prospective employees and stimulating them to apply for jobs in the organisation.
Planning function of management is conducted at which level of management?
What is meant by scientific management?
Sales promotion is helpful in new product launch. How?
How does elasticity of demand affect price level?
Super Fine Rice Ltd. has the largest share of 55% in the market. The company’s policy is to sell only for cash. In 2015, for the first time company’s number one position in the industry has been threatened because other companies started selling rice on credit* also. But the managers of Super Fine Rice Ltd. continued to rely on it’s previously tried and tested successful plans which didn”t work because the environment is not static. This led to decline in sales of Super Fine Rice Ltd. The above situation is indicating two limitations of planning which led to decline in it sales. Identify these limitations.
Customers have become more demanding due to changes in government policy. Why?
A dealer wants to send some gift items of glassware from Mumbai to Lucknow. Which type of packaging is needed here?
List any two personal objectives of management.
A sales person is asked to finalise a deal with a customer. The marketing manager allows him to give a discount upto 10% but the finance manager allows him to give discount of 5% only. Which principle is violated here?
OR
Which principle of management is violated, if a subordinate is asked to receive orders from two or more superiors?