Download App

Working of Institutions — Social Studies STD 9 — Question

CBSE BoardEnglish MediumSTD 9Social StudiesWorking of Institutions3 Marks
Question
What does ‘integration of judiciary’ mean?
✓

Answer

It means that the Supreme Court controls the judicial administration in the country. Its decisions are binding on all the other courts of the country.

It can take up any dispute:

  1. Between the citizens of the country.
  2. Between citizens and the government.
  3. Between two or more state governments.
  4. Between the union and state governments.

It is the highest court of appeal in civil and criminal cases. It can hear appeals against the decisions of the high courts.

Need a full question paper?

Generate a complete, print-ready paper with questions like this in minutes — across 16+ boards, with answer keys.

Start Generating Free

Explore more

More "SHORT ANSWER QUESTIONS [3M - POLITICAL SCIENCE]" from Working of Institutions→Working of Institutions — all question types→Social Studies STD 9 question papers→CBSE Board STD 9 question papers→CBSE Board question paper generator→

Similar questions

What are the various forms of government? Describe them in brief.
→
Do you think that elections promote democracy?
→
Can an Indian citizen enjoy the freedom to travel in any part of the country?
→
Distinguish between the democratic government and non-democratic government.
→
After reading the example of the reservation order, three students had different reactions about the role of the judiciary. Which view, according to you, is a correct reading of the role of judiciary?
Anjaiah says that judiciary is independent because it could have given a verdict against the government order. The Supreme Court did direct the government to modify it.
→
Why is democracy considered the best form of government?
→
What do you mean by 'independence of judiciary'?
→
Here are some reports of electoral malpractices from different parts of the world. Is there anything that these countries can learn from India to improve their elections? What would you suggest in each case?
  1. During an election in Nigeria, the officer in charge of counting votes deliberately increased the votes of one candidate and declared him elected. The court later found out that more than five lakh votes cast for one candidate were counted in favour of another.
  2. Just before elections in Fiji, a pamphlet was distributed warning voters that a vote for former Prime Minisiter, Mahendra Chaudhry will lead to bloodshed. This was a threat to voters of Indian origin.
  3. In the US, each state has its own method of voting, its own procedure of counting and its own authority for conducting elections. Authorities in the state of Florida took many controversial decisions that favoured Mr. Bush in the presidential elections in 2000. But no one could change those decisions.
→
What do you understand by ‘Moral Rights'?
→
How does democracy improve the quality of decision making?
→