Questions

3 Marks Question

🎯

Test yourself on this topic

9 questions · timed · auto-graded

Question 13 Marks
On the basis of Bohr's postulate obtain the formula for radius and total energy of electron in the $n^{\text {th }}$ stable orbit for hydrogen atom.
Answer
→ Bohr combined classical and early quantum concepts and gave his theory in the form of three postulates. These are :
→ (i) Bohr's first postulate : An electron in an atom could revolve in certain stable orbits without the emission of radiant energy.
→ According to this postulate, each atom has certain definite stable states in which it can exist, and each possible state has definite total energy. These are called the stationary states of the atom.
→This contrary to the predictions of electromagnetic theory.
→ (ii) Bohr's second postulate : The electron revolves around the nucleus only in those orbits for which the angular momentum is in integral multiple of $\frac{h}{2 \pi}$.
→ Where, $h$ is Planck's constant
$
\begin{array}{l}
h=6.625 \times 10^{-34} J s . \\
L=\frac{n h}{2 \pi} \text { Where, } n=1,2,3 \ldots .
\end{array}
$
→ (iii) Bohr's third postulate : An electron makes a transition from one of its specified non-radiating orbits to another of lower energy. When it does so, a photon is emitted having energy equal to the energy difference between the initial and final states.
→ The frequency of the emitted photon is then given by
$
h v=E_i-E_f
$
Where $E _i$ and $E _f$ are the energies of the initial and final states and $E _i> E _f$.
→ From Bohr's second postulate, the formula for the radius of $n^{\text {th }}$ orbit for hydrogen atom is.
$
r_n=\frac{n^2 h^2 \varepsilon_0}{\pi m e^2} \ldots(1)
$
→ The total energy of the electron in the stationary states of the hydrogen atom is
$
E_n=-\frac{1}{8 \pi \varepsilon_0} \frac{e^2}{r_n} \ldots(2)
$
→ Using equation (1) and equation (2)
$
\begin{array}{l}
E_n=-\frac{1}{8 \pi \varepsilon_0} \frac{e^2}{\left(\frac{n^2 h^2 \varepsilon_0}{\pi m e^2}\right)} \\
\therefore E_n=-\frac{m e^4}{8 \varepsilon_0^2 n^2 h^2}
\end{array}
$
→ Substituting $m=9.1 \times 10^{-31} kg$
$
\begin{array}{l}
e=1.6 \times 10^{-19} C \\
\varepsilon_0=8.85 \times 10^{-12} \frac{C^2}{Nm^2} \\
h=6.625 \times 10^{-34} Js
\end{array}
$
→ Simplifying equation,
$
E_n=-\frac{2.18 \times 10^{-18}}{n^2} J
$
→ Atomic energies are often expressed in electron volts $( eV )$.
$
\begin{array}{l}
\therefore E_n=-\frac{2.18 \times 10^{-18}}{n^2 \times 1.6 \times 10^{-19}} eV \\
\therefore E_n=-\frac{13.6}{n^2} eV
\end{array}
$
→ The negative sign of the total energy of an electron moving in an orbit means that the electron is bound with the nucleus.
→ Thus, energy will be required to remove the electron from the hydrogen atom to a distance infinitely far away from its nucleus.
View full question & answer
Question 23 Marks
Summarise any three experimental features and observation described in the experimental study of photoelectric effect.
View full question & answer
Question 33 Marks
Discuss the intensity of transmitted light when a polariod sheet is rotated between two crossed polaroids.
Answer
→ As shown in the fig., two polaroids $P_1$ and $P_3$ are arranged such that their pass axis are perpendicular to each other.
→ Polaroid $P_2$ is rotated between two crossed polaroids.
→ Suppose, during some position of $P_2$, the angle between the pass axis of $P_1$ and $P_2$ is $\theta$, since $P_1$ and $P_3$ are crossed, the angle between the pass axis of $P_2$ and $P_3$ will be $\frac{\pi}{2}-\theta$.
→ Let $I_0$ be the intensity of polarised light after passing through the first polariser $P_1\left(I_1=I_0\right)$.
→ Then the intensity of light after passing through second polariser $P_2$ will be
$
I_2=I_0 \cos ^2 \theta(\text { from Malus law) } \ldots(1)
$
→ This light is incident on polariser $P_3$ at an angle $\frac{\pi}{2}-\theta$. Hence the intensity of light energing from $P_3$ will be :
$
I_3=I_2 \cos ^2\left(\frac{\pi}{2}-\theta\right)
$
→ Substituting the value from equation (1),
$
\begin{array}{l}
I_3=I_0 \cos ^2 \theta \cos ^2\left(\frac{\pi}{2}-\theta\right) \\
I_3=I_0 \cos ^2 \theta \sin ^2 \theta \\
I_3=\frac{I_0}{4}\left(4 \sin ^2 \theta \cos ^2 \theta\right) \\
\therefore I_3=\frac{I_0}{4}\left(\sin ^2 2 \theta\right)
\end{array}
$
→ When $\theta=0, \frac{\pi}{2}, \pi, \frac{3 \pi}{2}$ or $2 \pi, I_3=0$ (Minimum intensity)
→ When $\theta=\frac{\pi}{4}, \frac{3 \pi}{4}, \frac{5 \pi}{4}, \frac{7 \pi}{4}, I_3=\frac{I_0}{4}$ (Maximum intensity)
View full question & answer
Question 43 Marks
(a) The radii of curvatures of the faces of a double convex lens are 10 cm . and 15 cm . Its focal length is 12 cm . What is the refractive index of the material of lens?
(b) A convex lens of glass has 20 cm focal length in air. What is focal length in water? (Refractive index of air water is 1.33 . Refractive index of air-glass $=1.5$ )
Answer
→ (i) $f=0.5 m$
$
\begin{array}{l}
\Rightarrow \text { Power of lens } P=\frac{1}{f} \\
\therefore P=\frac{1}{0.5} \\
\therefore P=2 D
\end{array}
$
→ (ii)
$\begin{aligned} R _1 & =10 cm R _2=-15 cm \\ f & =12 cm n _1=1 \text { (air) } \\ n_2 & =(?)\end{aligned}$
$\Rightarrow$ From lens maker's formula,
$
\begin{array}{l}
\frac{1}{f}=\left(\frac{n_2-n_1}{n_1}\right)\left(\frac{1}{R_1}-\frac{1}{R_2}\right) \\
\therefore \frac{1}{12}=\frac{\left(n_2-1\right)}{1}\left(\frac{1}{10}+\frac{1}{15}\right) \\
\therefore \frac{1}{12}=\left(n_2-1\right)\left(\frac{3+2}{30}\right) \\
\therefore \frac{1}{12}=\left(n_2-1\right)\left(\frac{5}{30}\right) \\
\therefore \frac{1}{12}=\left(n_2-1\right)\left(\frac{1}{6}\right) \\
\therefore \frac{1}{2}=n_2-1 \\
\therefore n_2=1+\frac{1}{2}=\frac{3}{2}(1.5)
\end{array}
$
→ The refractive index of material of lens is 1.5 .
→ (iii)
$
\begin{array}{l}
f_a=20 cm, f_w=? \\
n_a=1 n_w=1.33 n_g=1.5
\end{array}
$
→ for lens in air,
$
\frac{1}{f_a}=\left(\frac{n_g-n_a}{n_a}\right)\left(\frac{1}{R_1}-\frac{1}{R_2}\right)
...(1)$
→ for lens in water,
$
\frac{1}{f_w}=\left(\frac{n_g-n_w}{n_w}\right)\left(\frac{1}{R_1}-\frac{1}{R_2}\right)
...(2)$
→ By taking ratio of equation (1) & (2),
$
\begin{array}{l}
\frac{f_w}{f_a}=\left(\frac{n_g-n_a}{n_a}\right)\left(\frac{n_w}{n_g-n_w}\right) \\
\therefore \frac{f_w}{20}=\left(\frac{1.5-1}{1}\right)\left(\frac{1.33}{1.5-1.33}\right) \\
\therefore \frac{f_w}{20}=(0.5)\left(\frac{1.33}{0.17}\right) \\
\therefore f_w=78.23 cm
\end{array}
$
View full question & answer
Question 53 Marks
In actual transformers, small energy losses do occur. Give reason for it and how it can be reduce. (Any three)
Answer
→ When an AC voltage is applied to primary, the resulting current produces an alternating magnetic flux, which links the secondary and induces an emf in it. The value of this emf depends on number of turns in secondary.
→ We consider an ideal transformer in which the primary has negligible resistance and all the flux in the core links both primary and secondary windings.
→ Let $\varphi$ be the flux in each turn in the core at time $t$ due to current in the primary when a voltage ( $U_p$ ) is applied to it.
→ Then the induced emf or voltage $( E )$, in the secondary
$
\varepsilon_s=-N_s \frac{d \phi}{d t} \ldots(1)
$
where, $N _s$ is no. of turns in secondary.
→ The alternating flux, $\varphi$ also induces an $e m f$ called the back emf in the primary. This is,
$
\varepsilon_p=-N_p \frac{d \phi}{d t}
...(2)$
Where, $N _p$ is no. of turns in the primary.
→ But $\varepsilon_p=v_p$ If this were not so, the primary current would be infinite due to zero resistance. (as assumed)
→ If the secondary is an open circuit or the current taken from it is small, then to a good approximation, $\varepsilon_s=v_s$
→ From eq. (1) and (2),
$
v_s=-N_s \frac{d \phi}{d t} \ldots \text { (3) and } v_p=-N_p \frac{d \phi}{d t} ...(4)
$
(where $U _s$ is the voltage a cross secondary)
→ By taking the ratio of eq. (3) and (4),
$
\frac{v_s}{v_p}=\frac{N_s}{N_p}...(5)
$
→ Following three assumptions are used in obtaining the above relation :
(1) The primary resistance and current are small;
(2) The same flux links both the primary as well as secondary (as very less flux escapes from the core)
(3) The secondary current is small.
View full question & answer
Question 63 Marks
A horizontal straight wire 10 m long extending from east to west is falling with a speed of 5.0 $ms ^{-1}$ at right angle to the horizontal component of the earth's magnetic field $3 \times 10^{-5} Wb m ^{-2}$.
(a) What is the instantaneous value of the emf induced in the wire?
(b) What is the direction of the emf?
(c) Which end of the wire is at the higher electrical potential?
View full question & answer
Question 73 Marks
Obtain the formula for force acting between two parallel straight current carrying conductors and hence define one ampere.
View full question & answer
Question 83 Marks
Obtain the formula for equivalent emf and equivalent internal resistance of a series combination of two cells of emf $\varepsilon_1$ and $\varepsilon_2$ and internal resistance $r_1$ and $r_2$ respectively.
Answer
→ If the positive (or negative) terminal of two cells are connected to one point and their negative (or positive) terminal to another point, such connection of cells is called the parallel connection.
Image

→ The figure shows a parallel combination of two cells, the emf of cells are $\varepsilon_1$ and $\varepsilon_2$ respectively and the internal resistances are $r_1$ and $r_2$ respectively.
→ The currents leaving the positive terminals of the cells are $I_1$ and $I_2$ respectively. These currents meet near point $B_1$ so the total current at point $B _1$ is $I = I _1+ I _2$
→ Let $V\left(B_1\right)$ and $V\left(B_2\right)$ be the potentials at $B_1$ and $B_2$.
→ The potential diference across terminals of the first cell is
$
\begin{array}{l}
V=V\left(B_1\right)-V\left(B_2\right)=\varepsilon_1-I_1 r_1 \\
\therefore I_1 r_1=\varepsilon_1-V \\
\therefore I_1=\frac{\varepsilon_1-V}{r_1} \ldots(1)
\end{array}
$
→ The potential difference across terminals of the second cell is
$
\begin{array}{l}
V=V\left(B_1\right)-V\left(B_2\right)=\varepsilon_2-I_2 r_2 \\
\therefore I_2 r_2=\varepsilon_2-V
\end{array}
$
$
\therefore I_2=\frac{\varepsilon_2-V}{r_2}
...(2)$
→ But the total current is $I = I _1+ I _2$
→ Putting the values from equation (1) and (2) in above equation :
$
\begin{array}{l}
\therefore I=\frac{\varepsilon_1-V}{r_1}+\frac{\varepsilon_2-V}{r_2} \\
\therefore I=\frac{\varepsilon_1}{r_1}-\frac{V}{r_1}+\frac{\varepsilon_2}{r_2}-\frac{V}{r_2} \\
\therefore I=\frac{\varepsilon_1}{r_1}+\frac{\varepsilon_2}{r_2}-V\left(\frac{1}{r_1}+\frac{1}{r_2}\right) \\
\therefore V\left(\frac{1}{r_1}+\frac{1}{r_2}\right)=\frac{\varepsilon_1}{r_1}+\frac{\varepsilon_2}{r_2}-I \\
\therefore V\left(\frac{r_1+r_2}{r_1 r_2}\right)=\frac{\varepsilon_1 r_2+\varepsilon_2 r_1-I r_1 r_2}{r_1 r_2} \\
\therefore V\left(r_1+r_2\right)=\varepsilon_1 r_2+\varepsilon_2 r_1-I r_1 r_2 \\
\therefore V=\frac{\varepsilon_1 r_2+\varepsilon_2 r_1}{r_1+r_2}-I\left(\frac{r_1 r_2}{r_1+r_2}\right) \ldots(3)
\end{array}
$
→ Let the equivalent emf $\varepsilon_{e q}$ and equivalent internal resistance $r_{e q}$ for this combination.
$
\therefore V=\varepsilon_{e q}-I r_{e q} \cdots(4)
$
by comparing equation (3) and (4)
$
\begin{array}{l}
\therefore \varepsilon_{e q}=\frac{\varepsilon_1 r_2+\varepsilon_2 r_1}{r_1+r_2} \text { and } r_{e q}=\frac{r_1 r_2}{r_1+r_2} \\
\frac{\varepsilon_{e q}}{r_{e q}}=\frac{\frac{\varepsilon_1 r_2+\varepsilon_2 r_1}{\delta_1+r_2}}{\frac{r_1 r_2}{r_1+r_2}}=\frac{\varepsilon_1 r_2+\varepsilon_2 r_1}{r_1 r_2}=\frac{\varepsilon_1}{r_1}+\frac{\varepsilon_2}{r_2}
\end{array}
$
→ If there are $n$ cells of emf $\varepsilon_1, \varepsilon_2, \varepsilon_3 \ldots . . \varepsilon_n$ and internal resistances $r_1, r_2, r_3 \ldots . . r_n$ respectively are connected in parallel, the combination is equivalent to a single cell of emf $\varepsilon_{e q}$ and internal resistance $r_{e q}$.
$
\begin{array}{l}
\therefore \frac{1}{r_{e q}}=\frac{1}{r_1}+\frac{1}{r_2}+\frac{1}{r_3}+\ldots+\frac{1}{r_n} \\
\therefore \frac{\varepsilon_{e q}}{r_{e q}}=\frac{\varepsilon_1}{r_1}+\frac{\varepsilon_2}{r_2}+\frac{\varepsilon_3}{r_3}+\ldots+\frac{\varepsilon_n}{r_n}
\end{array}
$
View full question & answer
Question 93 Marks
A spherical conductor of radius 12 cm has a charge of $1.6 \times 10^{-7} C$ distributed uniformly on its surface. What is the electric field.
(a) inside the sphere?
(b) just outside the sphere?
(c) at a point 18 cm from the centre of the sphere?
Answer
→ (a) Given (actually it should be spherical shell) sphere is a conductor, so the electric charge is established only on the surface of the conductor. Hence the net charge inside the spherical conductor, will be zero hence the electric field inside shell will be zero.
→ (b) on the surface of the sphere:
(/ Just outside the sphere)
$\begin{array}{l}q=1.6 \times 10^{-7} C \\ R =12 \times 10^{-2} m \\ \text { Electric field } E =\frac{ kq }{ R ^2} \\ E =\frac{9 \times 10^9 \times 1.6 \times 10^{-7}}{\left(12 \times 10^{-2}\right)^2}\end{array}$
$\begin{array}{l}\therefore E=\frac{14.4 \times 10^2}{144 \times 10^{-4}} \\ \therefore E=1 \times 10^5 \frac{N}{ C }\end{array}$
→ (c) At a point 18 cm from the centre of the sphere : (E at distance $r> R$ )
$\begin{array}{l}\therefore E =\frac{k q}{r^2}=\frac{9 \times 10^9 \times 1.6 \times 10^{-7}}{\left(18 \times 10^{-2}\right)^2} \\ \therefore E =4.4 \times 10^4 \frac{N}{ C }\end{array}$
View full question & answer