Question
Prove that a closed equipotential surface with no charge within itself must enclose an equipotential volume.

Answer

Let us assume that in a closed equipotential surface with no charge the potential is changing from position to position. Let the potential just inside the surface is different to that of the surface causing in a potential gradient $\Big(\frac{\text{dV}}{\text{dr}}\Big)$ It means $\text{E}\neq0$ electric field comes into existence, which is given by as $\text{E}=-\frac{\text{dV}}{\text{dr}}$ It means there will be field lines pointing inwards or outwards from the surface. These lines cannot be again on the surface, as the surface is equipotential. It is possible only when the other end of the field lines are originated from the charges inside. This contradicts the original assumption. Hence, the entire volume inside must be equipotential.

Need a full question paper?

Generate a complete, print-ready paper with questions like this in minutes — across 16+ boards, with answer keys.

Start Generating Free

Similar questions

A square coil of side 10 cm consists of 20 turns and carries a current of 12 A. The coil is suspended vertically and the normal to the plane of the coil makes an angle of 30º with the direction of a uniform horizontal magnetic field of magnitude 0.80 T. What is the magnitude of torque experienced by the coil?
Define magnetic susceptibility of a material. Name two elements, one having positive susceptibility and the other having negative susceptibility. What does negative susceptibility signify
Explain electric potential energy difference and discuss its important points.
The relative luminosity of wavelength 600nm is 0.6. Find the radiant flux of 600nm needed to produce the same brightness sensation as produced by 120W of radiant flux at 555nm.
Find the ratio of intensities at two points on a screen in Young’s double slit experiment when waves from the two slits have a path difference of (i) 0 and (ii) $\frac{\lambda}{4}.$
Derive the equation of energy density for electromagnetic wave.
The length of a rod is exactly 1m when measured at rest. What will be its length when it moves at a speed of:
  1. $3 \times 10^5$m/s.
  2. $3 \times 10^6$m/s.
  3. $3 \times 10^7$m/s.
For a normal eye, the far point is at infinity and the near point of distinct vision is about 25 cm in front of the eye. The cornea of the eye provides a converging power of about 40 dioptres, and the least converging power of the eye-lens behind the cornea is about 20 dioptres. From this rough data estimate the range of accommodation (i.e., the range of converging power of the eye-lens) of a normal eye.
A traffic policeman sounds a whistle to stop a car-driver approaching towards him. The car-driver does not stop and takes the plea in court that because of the Doppler shift, the frequency of the whistle reaching him might have gone beyond the audible limit of 20kHz and he did not hear it. Experiments showed that the whistle emits a sound with frequency close to 16kHz. Assuming that the claim of the driver is true, how fast was he driving the car? Take the speed of sound in air to be 330m/s. Is this speed practical with today's technology?
When $1.0 \times 10^{12}$ electrons are transferred from one conductor to another, a potential difference of 10V appears between the conductors. Calculate the capacitance of the two-conductor system.