Question
Write short note on Physical Quality of Life Index.

Answer

$1.$ Introduction:
  • National Income and per capita income does not say anything about distribution of income.
  • The increasing income of a country is limited in some hands and if standard of living is not changed among all then it does not show economic development.
  • So for measuring standard of living Davis Morris gave the concept of $\text{PQLI.}$
  • For preparing this index following calculation are taken into consideration:
  • Literacy rate $(ii)$ Life expectancy $(iii)$ Child mortality rate
$2.$ Elements of Physical Quality of Life Index:
$(i)$ Literacy rate:
  • Any country's literacy rate shows education condition of a country.
  • Through percentage of literate people in the country we find literacy rate.
  • The higher education increases working capacity of people.
  • So people become more powerful for generating income and high standard of living is achieved.
$(ii)$ Life expectancy:
  • The life span of a new born baby is called life expectancy.
  • It is a average of life of people, environment, nutrition and doctor's facilities that shows the average life in society. Higher this service, shows the high life expectancy.
  • Life expectancy shows social condition and happiness of a society.
$(iii)$ Infant Mortality Rate:
  • The number of new born baby who die out of every $1000$ infants before completing their first year is known as infant mortality rate.
  • If infant mortality rate falls, it can be said that health care services of the country is good.
  • Pure drinking water, environment, awareness of ladies etc. affect on Infant Mortality Rate.
$3.$ Why Three Elements are required?
$(1)$ Through education, life expectancy, and child mortality rate we get perfect figure.
$(2)$ These indicators shows direct result of development. Through development education increases, life expectancy increases and child mortality rate decreases.
$(3)$ Through these elements we compare country wise development.
$\text{4. PQLI}$ construction:
  • For construction of $\text{PQLI,}$ Life expectancy, Infant Mortality rate, literacy rate is considered. Through this factor $1$ to $100$ rank is given to a country.
  • In all over the world whose life expectancy is higher, gets $100$ index and whose is lower gets $0.$
  • Between these two, the average countries get average index.
  • Same way infant mortality rate and education are also considered.
  • For preparing $\text{PQLI}$ following points are to be considered.
$(1)$ Give $100\%$ weightage to all three elements.
$(2)$ The ratio is between $0$ to $100.$
$(3)$ The total of these three can be divided by three and Average should be considered.
$(4)$ This ratio is called $\text{PQLI.}$
$(5)$ Here current year and base year are considered.
$5.$ Improtant Aspects:
$(1)$ Closer to $100$ better is the performance of all $3$ indices of $\text{PQLI}$ of a country.
$(2)$ Closer to $0,$ bad performance of $\text{PQLI}$ of the country.
$\text{(3) PQLI}$ is always between $0$ to $100.$
$(4)$ Higher the $\text{PQLI}$ more is the economic development.
$(5)$ Lower the $\text{PQLl,}$ lesser is the economic development.
$6.$ Positive Aspects:
$\text{(1) PQLI}$ is better index compared to the per capita income index.
$\text{(2) PQLI}$ is more related with use of money and not the level of money.
$\text{(3)}$ Education and health is considered for standard of human life.
$\text{(4) PQLI}$ is an indicator for lesser drawbacks as compared to national income and per capita income.
$\text{(5)}$ Through $\text{PQLI}$ comparisons can be made between different countries, different groups of countries or different states of the same country.
$(6)$ We can create $\text{PQLI}$ for Urban areas, females males and in this way a comparison can be done.
$7.$ Limitations of $\text{PQLI:}$
$(1)$ Only $3$ aspects are included and on that basis it cannot be categorically stated, whether a country has actually developed or not. To get a correct picture we need to include other factor also to the existing ones.
$(2)$ Only averages are depicted. Only average of three aspects of a country does not show the prominence or backwardness of each indicator.
$(3)$ If a country's present $\text{PQLI}$ is high, it cannot be generalized that the economic development is high against other countries.
$(4)$ All three aspects do not have equal importance in human life.
$(5)$ It is not right to give equal weightage $(100)$ to all indicators.
$(6)$ Growth of income has high importance in physical quality of life index and ignoring that is not possible.
$(7)$ The $\text{PQLI}$ of rich countries rise at a slower rate because average life cannot increase beyond a particular limit.
$(8)$ It is not a final indicator because it ignores poverty, unemployment of backward area and many more.

Need a full question paper?

Generate a complete, print-ready paper with questions like this in minutes — across 16+ boards, with answer keys.

Start Generating Free